Course Details
Number of Days: 4
Attendance: In-Person
Details below last updated: July 19/2026
Course Description
Modern reverse engineering is moving toward automation, custom tooling, and agent-assisted workflows. These workflows speed up formerly slow and manual analysis tasks, but they quickly run into limits when binaries actively resist analysis through control-flow obfuscation, virtualization, mixed Boolean-Arithmetic (MBA), and other transformations. This training teaches the deobfuscation techniques, validation strategies, and automation patterns needed to make reverse engineering workflows effective on real-world protected targets.
Participants first learn how modern obfuscation techniques complicate reverse engineering, and then gradually build the deobfuscation techniques required to attack them in hands-on sessions. Along the way, they deepen their understanding of program analysis and learn when and how to apply different techniques in practice.
We begin with core obfuscation patterns and practical ways to attack them. Participants learn how to recognize common protection mechanisms, understand how they interfere with analysis and decompilation, and gain traction through careful manual analysis and targeted cleanup.
Early in the course, we introduce automation and agent-assisted reverse engineering as a practical layer on top of manual analysis. Participants learn how to set up analysis environments that make automated workflows easier to run, inspect, and repeat. They then learn how to divide analysis goals into smaller tasks, connect the required tools and scripts to the workflow, preserve useful intermediate artifacts, and validate each step. The goal is to turn manual expertise into repeatable, validated workflows that can be reused on related targets.
From there, the course builds toward more powerful reasoning with SMT-based analysis. Participants learn how to prove properties of code, reason about complex computations, and verify whether MBA-heavy expressions are equivalent to simpler rewrites. SMT then becomes a recurring building block for the automated techniques that follow.
To scale the analysis, the training introduces intermediate representations and compiler-style simplification passes that help normalize protected code and expose higher-level control-flow structures. On top of this, participants use symbolic execution to automate larger parts of deobfuscation, combine symbolic reasoning with SMT solving to attack opaque predicates, and explore feasible execution paths through protected code.
Building on these foundations, the course then returns to virtualization-based obfuscation. Participants learn how to use symbolic execution to identify virtual machine components, reason about instruction handlers, validate recovered semantics against traces, and write custom disassemblers and analysis helpers to reconstruct original program behavior.
The training also covers MBA simplification and program synthesis. Participants simplify code based on observed behavior, use synthesis to recover compact expressions, apply algebraic simplification techniques, and validate the correctness of simplified computations. These techniques are used to attack MBA-heavy expressions and to recover instruction-handler semantics of virtual machines.
By the end of the training, participants will understand how these techniques fit together in practical deobfuscation pipelines. The final part of the course focuses on scaling these workflows across larger protected programs and related obfuscation components. We also examine why automated and agent-assisted analysis fails on hardened targets, including patterns that deliberately mislead tools and agents. Participants learn how to recover from these failures by improving the analysis setup, strengthening validation, and reintroducing human guidance where automation reaches its limits.
Teaching
The training has a strong focus on hands-on exercises. Short lecture segments provide the background needed to understand how a method works, when it is useful, and where its limits are. The exercises then show how to apply these methods to real deobfuscation problems by building small, purpose-built tools and combining individual techniques into practical workflows. The trainer actively supports participants during the exercises, and after each task, we discuss different solutions in class. Participants also receive detailed reference solutions that they can use during and after the course.
In selected optional exercises, participants with access to LLM subscriptions or API keys can also use agent-assisted workflows to analyze protections and to write and validate analysis tools. The focus, however, always remains on the underlying deobfuscation techniques.
While the hands-on sessions primarily focus on x86 assembly, the underlying tools and techniques also transfer to other architectures such as MIPS, PPC, and ARM.
Learning Objectives
Recognize common obfuscation techniques and gain traction through manual analysis of protected code
Build practical analysis strategies for protected binaries that resist standard static and dynamic analysis
Use automated and agent-assisted tooling to structure, orchestrate, and partially automate deobfuscation workflows
Apply SMT solving, intermediate representations, symbolic execution, and program synthesis to practical deobfuscation problems
Attack virtualization-based obfuscation by recovering VM architecture and writing custom disassemblers
Simplify MBA-heavy computations and validate recovered semantics
Understand common failure modes of agent-assisted analysis on hardened targets and develop practical recovery strategies
Class Outline
The training roughly follows the outline below:
Introduction to Code (De)obfuscation
Motivation
Why protected binaries break standard reverse-engineering workflows
Core program-analysis techniques used throughout the course
Obfuscation foundations and manual analysis
Opaque predicates
Control-flow flattening
Virtual machines (VMs)
VM hardening techniques
Mixed Boolean-Arithmetic (MBA)
Recognizing protection patterns and developing deobfuscation strategies
Foundations of Automated and Agent-Assisted Reverse Engineering
From manual analysis to repeatable workflows
Agents as tool orchestrators
Analyst guidance and task decomposition
Sandboxed analysis environments
Tool access for disassemblers, decompilers, emulators, and scripts
Reusable playbooks and validation checkpoints
Intermediate artifacts, logs, and context management
SMT-Based Program Analysis
SAT and SMT solvers
Encoding program-analysis problems for SMT solvers
Proving semantic equivalence
Proving properties of code
Solving complex program constraints
Reasoning about MBA-heavy expressions
Validating rewrites and simplifications
Intermediate Representations and Compiler-Style Simplification
Intermediate representations for reverse engineering
Static single assignment (SSA)
Dead code elimination
Constant propagation / folding
Normalizing and simplifying obfuscated code
Recovering higher-level control-flow structure
Agent-assisted development of simplification and analysis passes
Symbolic Execution Foundations
Symbolic and semantic simplification of obfuscated code
Scaling symbolic execution workflows
Interaction with SMT solvers
Breaking arithmetic opaque predicates
Exploration of feasible program paths
Symbolic execution in iterative deobfuscation workflows
Symbolic Execution for Attacking Virtualization-Based Obfuscation
Automated analysis of virtual machine components
Reasoning about instruction handlers
Writing disassemblers and analysis helpers based on symbolic execution
Trace-based validation of VM execution and handler semantics
Agent-assisted refinement of VM analysis tooling
Reconstructing original program semantics
MBA Simplification and Program Synthesis
Concept of program synthesis
Learning semantics from input/output behavior
Obtaining input/output pairs from code
Search-based and stochastic synthesis
Local synthesis and inference rules
Simplification oracles and expression databases
Simplifying large expression trees
Algebraic approaches to MBA simplification
Combining synthesis, algebraic simplification, and SMT validation
Simplifying MBA-heavy computations
Synthesizing VM instruction-handler semantics
Scaling Automated and Agent-Assisted Deobfuscation Workflows
Identifying and prioritizing obfuscated code regions
Deobfuscation pipeline design
Combining solvers, symbolic execution, synthesis, and custom tooling
Turning manual procedures into reusable automation
Scaling across functions, obfuscation components, and related targets
Trace-based validation and iterative refinement
Automation-Resistant and Anti-Agentic Patterns
Recognizing automation-resistant and anti-agentic patterns
Search-space and validation-cost amplification
Tool friction and misleading artifacts
Recovery strategies
Requirements and Recommendations
Intended Audience
This training is intended for reverse engineers, malware analysts, vulnerability researchers, offensive security engineers, security consultants, and tooling engineers who want to analyze protected or obfuscated binaries more effectively and build practical deobfuscation workflows. It is also suitable for participants who want to understand how advanced program-analysis techniques, automation, and agent-assisted workflows can be applied to reverse engineering.
The course is not a general AI, LLM, or prompt-engineering class. Its focus remains on software deobfuscation, program analysis, custom tooling, and practical workflows for protected binaries.
Prerequisites
Participants should have basic reverse-engineering skills and be familiar with x86 assembly and Python. No prior experience with AI agents or LLM tooling for reverse engineering is required.
Software Requirements
Participants should have a disassembler of their choice (e.g., IDA, Ghidra, or Binary Ninja) and a working Docker installation. A Docker image with all required tools and course material will be provided.
Optional Agent-Assisted Exercises
External LLM access would be beneficial, but is not strictly required. Participants may use their own LLM subscriptions or API keys for selected optional agent-assisted exercises, but such access is not provided as part of the training.
About the Instructor: Tim Blazytko
Tim Blazytko is a well-known binary security researcher and reverse-engineering expert with a PhD in program analysis. He focuses on independent consulting and hands-on work across reverse engineering and software protection. He regularly contributes to the reverse engineering community through trainings, international conference talks, research papers, and open-source tools. Furthermore, he supports clients with advanced binary analysis, malware investigations, and security audits. Tim also serves as Chief Scientist at Emproof.

